I liked
that in this letter the writer Roger Mindel said that he wanted to learn enough
sign language to “be fully understood, and, as important, to learn about the
deaf and their culture” (pg.201). He discovers that he knew nothing about the
deaf culture and language. I also thought that that about myself after reading
a few chapters of this book and attending a few weeks of my ASL class. He asks
the authors if it is wrong to want the deaf woman in his office to verbalize.
The authors say that, “It’s not wrong-
it’s human nature” (pg. 202). I understand why he wants her to speak but at the
same time I think that is a little selfish of him. The author’s brought this to
my attention, “But if speech is the portal to success, is non-speech the
automatic gateway to second-class citizenship?” (pg.202). This statement really
calls hearing people out on their selfish expectations.
The fact that “Good articulation is
notoriously difficult both to achieve and maintain, especially for those born deaf
or early-deafened” (pg.202) was reemphasized which I appreciated. I could only
imagine what a struggle that must be. “You can never really be sure how you
sound” (pg.202). It was sad to read that a lot of deaf people don’t feel
confident using their voices. “They know that their voices sound harsh and
unpleasant; they’re embarrassed about using them” (pg.202). I agree with the
advice the authors gave towards the end of the chapter, “As for wanting your
Deaf co-worker to verbalize, that really has to be her decision” (pg.203) and
that “It should be voluntary” (pg.203).
I liked that Roger Mindel wanted to learn ASL and about the Deaf community, too. It's really cool to read about that kind of enthusiasm from hearing people in the book. Most of it focuses on how ignorant we are!
ReplyDelete